Hebephilia and the DSM-V Controversy  
  Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 38 #3 (June 2009):

Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and the DSM-V
by Ray Blanchard, Amy D. Lykins, Diane Wherrett, Michael E. Kuban, James M. Cantor, Thomas Blak, Robert Dickey and Philip E. Klassen

The Public Policy Implications of “Hebephilia”: A Response to Blanchard et al.
by Karen Franklin

Manufacturing Mental Disorder by Pathologizing Erotic Age Orientation: A Comment on Blanchard et al.

by Philip Tromovitch

Adult Sexual Attraction to Early-Stage Adolescents: Phallometry Doesn’t Equal Pathology

by Thomas K. Zander

Are There “Hebephiles” Among Us? A Response to Blanchard et al.
by Joseph J. Plaud

Should Hebephilia be a Mental Disorder? A Reply to Blanchard et al.
by Gregory DeClue

When Is an Unusual Sexual Interest a Mental Disorder?
by Charles Moser

Reply to Letters Regarding Pedophilia, Hebephilia, and the DSM-V
by Ray Blanchard


Please note that the above links provide only a "preview" of each article. The full articles may be requested from the primary authors, by emailing them at the addresses provided on the first page of each article.

More on hebephilia:


Invasion of the hebephile hunters: Or, the story of how an archaic word got a new lease on life (blog post)